Ecuador vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Ecuador
2.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Africa
2.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Ecuador rank
125th
South Africa rank
124th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
-1001020196819952022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.08 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 125th and South Africa ranks 124th of 175 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5713 current US$ per square kilometre 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9971 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Ecuador and South Africa?
0.08 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 125th and South Africa ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.