Eswatini vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Eswatini
70.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Jamaica
71.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
35th
Jamaica rank
34th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Jamaica
0100200300400196819952022

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 71.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.28 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Jamaica ahead.

Eswatini ranks 35th and Jamaica ranks 34th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 25.58 current US$ per square kilometre 89.1 current US$ per square kilometre 63.52 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 57.03 current US$ per square kilometre 132.87 current US$ per square kilometre 75.84 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 78.95 current US$ per square kilometre 234.9 current US$ per square kilometre 155.95 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 47.09 current US$ per square kilometre 59.28 current US$ per square kilometre 12.19 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 33.31 current US$ per square kilometre 47.83 current US$ per square kilometre 14.52 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre 48.86 current US$ per square kilometre 10 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 73.94 current US$ per square kilometre 51.26 current US$ per square kilometre 22.68 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 71.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Jamaica?
0.28 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Jamaica?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Jamaica rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 35th and Jamaica ranks 34th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/jamaica/">Eswatini vs Jamaica: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.