Eswatini vs Micronesia (country): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Eswatini
70.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Micronesia (country)
56.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
35th
Micronesia (country) rank
37th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Micronesia (country)
-50005001.0k1.5k196819952022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre against 56.97 current US$ per square kilometre in Micronesia (country), a difference of 13.85 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Micronesia (country)'s.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.

Eswatini ranks 35th and Micronesia (country) ranks 37th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia (country) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
1990s 48.51 current US$ per square kilometre 582.54 current US$ per square kilometre 534.03 current US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2000s 13.18 current US$ per square kilometre 85.71 current US$ per square kilometre 72.54 current US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2010s 28.91 current US$ per square kilometre 39.7 current US$ per square kilometre 10.79 current US$ per square kilometre Micronesia (country)
2020s 76.03 current US$ per square kilometre 46.23 current US$ per square kilometre 29.8 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Micronesia (country)?
Eswatini, at 70.82 current US$ per square kilometre against 56.97 current US$ per square kilometre in Micronesia (country) as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Micronesia (country)?
13.85 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Micronesia (country)?
18 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Micronesia (country) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 35th and Micronesia (country) ranks 37th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Micronesia (country): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/micronesia-fed-sts/">Eswatini vs Micronesia (country): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.