IDA total vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

IDA total
13.27 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Mauritius
787.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
IDA total rank
6th
Mauritius rank
7th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • IDA total
  • Mauritius
0200400600800196819952022

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 787.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.27 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 774.44 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 59.3 times IDA total's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

IDA total ranks 6th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 44 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre 484.24 current US$ per square kilometre 477.75 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 17.53 current US$ per square kilometre 475.86 current US$ per square kilometre 458.33 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 16.9 current US$ per square kilometre 275.37 current US$ per square kilometre 258.47 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 12.48 current US$ per square kilometre 288.67 current US$ per square kilometre 276.19 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 12.15 current US$ per square kilometre 280.32 current US$ per square kilometre 268.17 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 12.82 current US$ per square kilometre 668.43 current US$ per square kilometre 655.61 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, IDA total or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 787.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 13.27 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between IDA total and Mauritius?
774.44 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Mauritius?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA total and Mauritius rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
IDA total ranks 6th and Mauritius ranks 7th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/mauritius/">IDA total vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.