Jamaica vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Jamaica
71.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Lesotho
69.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Jamaica rank
34th
Lesotho rank
36th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Jamaica
  • Lesotho
0100200300400196819952022

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 71.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 36th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 89.1 current US$ per square kilometre 15.48 current US$ per square kilometre 73.62 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 132.87 current US$ per square kilometre 62.52 current US$ per square kilometre 70.36 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 234.9 current US$ per square kilometre 120.98 current US$ per square kilometre 113.92 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 59.28 current US$ per square kilometre 100.92 current US$ per square kilometre 41.64 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 47.83 current US$ per square kilometre 42.95 current US$ per square kilometre 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 48.86 current US$ per square kilometre 36.72 current US$ per square kilometre 12.14 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 51.26 current US$ per square kilometre 57.25 current US$ per square kilometre 5.99 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Jamaica or Lesotho?
Jamaica, at 71.1 current US$ per square kilometre against 69.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Jamaica and Lesotho?
1.7 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lesotho?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Jamaica and Lesotho rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Jamaica ranks 34th and Lesotho ranks 36th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/lesotho/">Jamaica vs Lesotho: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.