Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Samoa
288.23 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
463.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2002
Samoa rank
14th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Samoa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0200400600800196819952022

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 463.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 288.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 174.93 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.6 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 14th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 11th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 394.58 current US$ per square kilometre 61.4 current US$ per square kilometre 333.18 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 506.01 current US$ per square kilometre 209.47 current US$ per square kilometre 296.53 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 279.15 current US$ per square kilometre 106.58 current US$ per square kilometre 172.57 current US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 151.94 current US$ per square kilometre 242.11 current US$ per square kilometre 90.16 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Samoa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 463.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 288.23 current US$ per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2002.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
174.93 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2002.
How do Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Samoa ranks 14th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 11th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.