South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

South Sudan
20.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
17.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan rank
63rd
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • South Sudan
  • Zimbabwe
0102030196819952022

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 20.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.28 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

South Sudan ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 175 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 5.67 current US$ per square kilometre 16.03 current US$ per square kilometre 10.35 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 13.98 current US$ per square kilometre 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
South Sudan, at 20.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 17.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
3.28 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
South Sudan ranks 63rd and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-sudan/zimbabwe/">South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.