Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP

Azerbaijan
633,190 current US$
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina
625,144 current US$
in 2022
Azerbaijan rank
104th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
105th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
-2.0M02.0M4.0M6.0M199420082022

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 633,190 current US$ against 625,144 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 8,046 current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 1.68 million current US$ 3.15 million current US$ 1.46 million current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 2.35 million current US$ 602,000 current US$ 1.75 million current US$ Azerbaijan
2010s 744,565 current US$ 483,287 current US$ 261,278 current US$ Azerbaijan
2020s 561,848 current US$ 496,239 current US$ 65,609 current US$ Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Azerbaijan, at 633,190 current US$ against 625,144 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
8,046 current US$, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp?
Azerbaijan ranks 104th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
225 places, 9,792 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.