Bahrain vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP

Bahrain
-390,000 current US$
in 2000
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-230,000 current US$
in 2003
Bahrain rank
177th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
175th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP over time

  • Bahrain
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-500.0k0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M197019862003

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -230,000 current US$ against -390,000 current US$ in Bahrain, a difference of 160,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Bahrain ahead.

Bahrain ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 175th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 873,333 current US$ 113,333 current US$ 760,000 current US$ Bahrain
1980s 972,000 current US$ 237,000 current US$ 735,000 current US$ Bahrain
1990s 47,500 current US$ 236,250 current US$ 188,750 current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s -390,000 current US$ -310,000 current US$ 80,000 current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp, Bahrain or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -230,000 current US$ against -390,000 current US$ in Bahrain as of 2003.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp between Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
160,000 current US$, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
25 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2000.
How do Bahrain and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp?
Bahrain ranks 177th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 175th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahrain vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us/bahrain/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us/bahrain/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Bahrain vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
224 places, 9,778 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.