Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled

Brazil
2.53 million current US$
in 2023
China
2.91 million current US$
in 2023
Brazil rank
49th
China rank
47th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Brazil
  • China
05.0M10.0M15.0M197720002023

How they compare

China currently reports 2.91 million current US$ against 2.53 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 380,630 current US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was China ahead.

Brazil ranks 49th and China ranks 47th of 157 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.46 million current US$ 10.95 million current US$ 9.48 million current US$ China
1990s 1.85 million current US$ 6.41 million current US$ 4.55 million current US$ China
2000s 965,000 current US$ 4.36 million current US$ 3.39 million current US$ China
2010s 1.74 million current US$ 2.98 million current US$ 1.24 million current US$ China
2020s 2.67 million current US$ 2.96 million current US$ 292,238 current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled, Brazil or China?
China, at 2.91 million current US$ against 2.53 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled between Brazil and China?
380,630 current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled?
Brazil ranks 49th and China ranks 47th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 7,794 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) with 350 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.