Kiribati vs Latvia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled
Kiribati
60,000 current US$
in 2002
Latvia
60,000 current US$
in 2003
Kiribati rank
132nd
Latvia rank
132nd
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Kiribati
- Latvia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 60,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 0 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 132nd of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 68,000 current US$ | 56,000 current US$ | 12,000 current US$ | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 46,667 current US$ | 73,333 current US$ | 26,667 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled, Kiribati or Latvia?
- Kiribati, at 60,000 current US$ against 60,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled between Kiribati and Latvia?
- 0 current US$, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2002.
- How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled?
- Kiribati ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 132nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) with 350 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.