Korea vs Oman: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled
Korea
150,000 current US$
in 1998
Oman
140,000 current US$
in 2010
Korea rank
123rd
Oman rank
125th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Korea
- Oman
How they compare
Korea currently reports 150,000 current US$ against 140,000 current US$ in Oman, a difference of 10,000 current US$.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 123rd and Oman ranks 125th of 157 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 217,500 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | 127,500 current US$ | Korea |
| 1990s | 222,222 current US$ | 91,111 current US$ | 131,111 current US$ | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled, Korea or Oman?
- Korea, at 150,000 current US$ against 140,000 current US$ in Oman as of 1998.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled between Korea and Oman?
- 10,000 current US$, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Oman?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 1998.
- How do Korea and Oman rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), gaps filled?
- Korea ranks 123rd and Oman ranks 125th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) with 350 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.