East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 59.43 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 57.35 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 28.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 47 groups.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.21 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 24.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.38 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 30 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.58 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 47.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.31 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 59.43 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.08 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea?
- 57.35 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 29th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.