Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Equatorial Guinea
59.43 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
67.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
26th
Eswatini rank
23rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Eswatini
020406080100197720002023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 59.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 8.53 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Eswatini ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 155 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Eswatini Difference Ahead
1980s 10.73 current US$ per square kilometre 16.21 current US$ per square kilometre 5.48 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 24.21 current US$ per square kilometre 24.65 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4444 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 32.09 current US$ per square kilometre 36.16 current US$ per square kilometre 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 33.69 current US$ per square kilometre 63.29 current US$ per square kilometre 29.6 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 47.33 current US$ per square kilometre 64.45 current US$ per square kilometre 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 59.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
8.53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/eswatini/">Equatorial Guinea vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.