Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Eswatini
67.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
62.45 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
23rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
25th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
020406080100197720002023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 5.51 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 23rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 155 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1970s 13.95 current US$ per square kilometre 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 17.05 current US$ per square kilometre 5.57 current US$ per square kilometre 11.48 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 24.65 current US$ per square kilometre 16.22 current US$ per square kilometre 8.43 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 36.16 current US$ per square kilometre 32.97 current US$ per square kilometre 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 73.09 current US$ per square kilometre 48.18 current US$ per square kilometre 24.91 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 64.45 current US$ per square kilometre 57.2 current US$ per square kilometre 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Eswatini, at 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 62.45 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
5.51 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
41 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 23rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.