Eswatini vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Eswatini
67.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
89.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1985
Eswatini rank
23rd
Singapore rank
20th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Singapore
020406080100197720002023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 89.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 21.59 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 20th of 155 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 13.95 current US$ per square kilometre 44.78 current US$ per square kilometre 30.82 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 20.64 current US$ per square kilometre 59.7 current US$ per square kilometre 39.06 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Singapore?
Singapore, at 89.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 67.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 1985.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Singapore?
21.59 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Singapore?
7 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1985.
How do Eswatini and Singapore rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 23rd and Singapore ranks 20th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/singapore/">Eswatini vs Singapore: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.