Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
7.48 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China
202.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1991
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
11th
Hong Kong, China rank
8th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hong Kong, China
050100150200197719992022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 194.54 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 27.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 8th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre 32.41 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 2.19 current US$ per square kilometre 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre 199.83 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.48 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 1991.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
194.54 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
10 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 1991.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 8th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.