Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Hong Kong, China
202.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1991
Rwanda
133.24 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
8th
Rwanda rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Rwanda
050100150200197720002023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 133.24 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 68.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.5 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 155 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1980s 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre 22.11 current US$ per square kilometre 11.51 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre 66.48 current US$ per square kilometre 135.54 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Rwanda?
Hong Kong, China, at 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 133.24 current US$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 1991.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
68.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 1991.
How do Hong Kong, China and Rwanda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.