Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current) … UNFPA square

Hong Kong
202.02 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1991
Sub-Saharan Africa
7.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current) … UNFPA square over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
050100150200197720002023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 194.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 25.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 155 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 33.63 current US$ per square kilometre 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre 32.27 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre 2.79 current US$ per square kilometre 199.23 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Hong Kong or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Hong Kong, at 202.02 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 1991.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa?
194.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa?
10 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 1991.
How do Hong Kong and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 155 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sub-saharan-africa/">Hong Kong vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.