Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square

Sub-Saharan Africa
7.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
158.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th
Timor-Leste rank
9th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Timor-Leste
050100150200197720002023

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 158.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 151.13 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 20.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 47 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9541 current US$ per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 4.52 current US$ per square kilometre 105.58 current US$ per square kilometre 101.06 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre 132.21 current US$ per square kilometre 126.48 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 7.16 current US$ per square kilometre 134.45 current US$ per square kilometre 127.29 current US$ per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square, Sub-Saharan Africa or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 158.96 current US$ per square kilometre against 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square between Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste?
151.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Timor-Leste rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unfpa (current us$), per square?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th and Timor-Leste ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unfpa-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/timor-leste/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Timor-Leste: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,368 data points, 1977–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.