Chile vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled

Chile
170,000 current US$
in 1998
Eswatini
160,000 current US$
in 2003
Chile rank
105th
Eswatini rank
107th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Chile
  • Eswatini
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M197119872003

How they compare

Chile currently reports 170,000 current US$ against 160,000 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 10,000 current US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 129 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 417,500 current US$ 127,500 current US$ 290,000 current US$ Chile
1980s 190,000 current US$ 1.21 million current US$ 1.02 million current US$ Eswatini
1990s 276,667 current US$ 1.34 million current US$ 1.07 million current US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled, Chile or Eswatini?
Chile, at 170,000 current US$ against 160,000 current US$ in Eswatini as of 1998.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled between Chile and Eswatini?
10,000 current US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
14 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 1998.
How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled?
Chile ranks 105th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-gaps-filled/chile/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-gaps-filled/chile/eswatini/">Chile vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 6,351 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.