Croatia vs Kazakhstan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Croatia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 240,000 current US$ against 187,150 current US$ in Kazakhstan, a difference of 52,850 current US$.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 100th and Kazakhstan ranks 103rd of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.88 million current US$ | 900,000 current US$ | 3.98 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 240,000 current US$ | 460,000 current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled, Croatia or Kazakhstan?
- Croatia, at 240,000 current US$ against 187,150 current US$ in Kazakhstan as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled between Croatia and Kazakhstan?
- 52,850 current US$, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Kazakhstan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2010.
- How do Croatia and Kazakhstan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Kazakhstan ranks 103rd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.