Cuba vs Eswatini: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled
Cuba
140,000 current US$
in 2009
Eswatini
160,000 current US$
in 2003
Cuba rank
110th
Eswatini rank
107th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 160,000 current US$ against 140,000 current US$ in Cuba, a difference of 20,000 current US$.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cuba ranks 110th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 347,778 current US$ | 1.24 million current US$ | 896,667 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 422,500 current US$ | 205,000 current US$ | 217,500 current US$ | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 160,000 current US$ against 140,000 current US$ in Cuba as of 2003.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 20,000 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2003.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 110th and Eswatini ranks 107th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.