Latvia vs Malta: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled
Latvia
70,000 current US$
in 2002
Malta
120,000 current US$
in 2002
Latvia rank
117th
Malta rank
114th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 120,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 50,000 current US$.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.7 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Malta ahead.
Latvia ranks 117th and Malta ranks 114th of 129 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 230,000 current US$ | 220,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 180,000 current US$ | 136,667 current US$ | 43,333 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled, Latvia or Malta?
- Malta, at 120,000 current US$ against 70,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled between Latvia and Malta?
- 50,000 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2002.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 117th and Malta ranks 114th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) with 381 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.