Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita

Early-demographic dividend
0.0288 current US$ per person
in 2022
Hong Kong, China
0.3387 current US$ per person
in 1996
Early-demographic dividend rank
26th
Hong Kong, China rank
26th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Hong Kong, China
012345196919952022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.3387 current US$ per person against 0.0288 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.3099 current US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 11.7 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Hong Kong, China ranks 26th of 46 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0171 current US$ per person 0.5843 current US$ per person 0.5672 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 0.1015 current US$ per person 1.32 current US$ per person 1.21 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.1054 current US$ per person 2.25 current US$ per person 2.15 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.3387 current US$ per person against 0.0288 current US$ per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
0.3099 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China?
20 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1996.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Hong Kong, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 26th and Hong Kong, China ranks 26th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/hong-kong-sar-china/">Early-demographic dividend vs Hong Kong, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,970 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.