Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.0253 current US$ per person
in 2023
Slovenia
0.3109 current US$ per person
in 2002
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
28th
Slovenia rank
28th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Slovenia
0123196919962023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.3109 current US$ per person against 0.0253 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.2856 current US$ per person.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 12.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Slovenia ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 46 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3015 current US$ per person 1.23 current US$ per person 0.9256 current US$ per person Slovenia
2000s 0.5175 current US$ per person 0.3331 current US$ per person 0.1844 current US$ per person Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.3109 current US$ per person against 0.0253 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2002.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Slovenia?
0.2856 current US$ per person, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Slovenia?
8 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Slovenia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 28th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/slovenia/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Slovenia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,970 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.