Hong Kong, China vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square

Hong Kong, China
2,076 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Macau, China
6,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1990
Hong Kong, China rank
2nd
Macau, China rank
1st

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Macau, China
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196919821996

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,076 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 3,924 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 2.9 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Macau, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 128 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Macau, China Difference Ahead
1960s 49.02 current US$ per square kilometre 3,500 current US$ per square kilometre 3,451 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1970s 19.61 current US$ per square kilometre 10,500 current US$ per square kilometre 10,480 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1980s 7,853 current US$ per square kilometre 42,000 current US$ per square kilometre 34,147 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 15,687 current US$ per square kilometre 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre 9,687 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 6,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,076 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 1990.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Macau, China?
3,924 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Macau, China?
11 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 1990.
How do Hong Kong, China and Macau, China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per square?
Hong Kong, China ranks 2nd and Macau, China ranks 1st of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/macao-sar-china/">Hong Kong, China vs Macau, China: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,888 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.