Eswatini vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of

Eswatini
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2003
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Eswatini rank
35th
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of over time

  • Eswatini
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.0020.0040.006197619992022

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 88.2 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 35th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 128 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0037 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0037 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
1990s 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini
2000s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per unit of, Eswatini or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Eswatini, at 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2003.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per unit of between Eswatini and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
16 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2003.
How do Eswatini and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr (current us$), per unit of?
Eswatini ranks 35th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Eswatini vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,815 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.