Belarus vs Eritrea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR

Belarus
818,520 current US$
in 2021
Eritrea
789,000 current US$
in 2023
Belarus rank
75th
Eritrea rank
78th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR over time

  • Belarus
  • Eritrea
05.0M10.0M15.0M199420082023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 818,520 current US$ against 789,000 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 29,520 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eritrea ahead.

Belarus ranks 75th and Eritrea ranks 78th of 129 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eritrea Difference Ahead
2000s 542,000 current US$ 1.11 million current US$ 568,000 current US$ Eritrea
2010s 562,092 current US$ 975,029 current US$ 412,937 current US$ Eritrea
2020s 937,786 current US$ 693,677 current US$ 244,109 current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unhcr, Belarus or Eritrea?
Belarus, at 818,520 current US$ against 789,000 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2021.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unhcr between Belarus and Eritrea?
29,520 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eritrea?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Eritrea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unhcr?
Belarus ranks 75th and Eritrea ranks 78th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eritrea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us/belarus/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unhcr-current-us/belarus/eritrea/">Belarus vs Eritrea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
175 places, 5,970 data points, 1969–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.