El Salvador vs Romania: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 833,000 current US$ against 790,000 current US$ in Romania, a difference of 43,000 current US$.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 117th and Romania ranks 118th of 142 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.52 million current US$ | 1.31 million current US$ | 216,000 current US$ | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 688,000 current US$ | 706,000 current US$ | 18,000 current US$ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled, El Salvador or Romania?
- El Salvador, at 833,000 current US$ against 790,000 current US$ in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled between El Salvador and Romania?
- 43,000 current US$, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
- El Salvador ranks 117th and Romania ranks 118th of 142 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.