IBRD only vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled

IBRD only
143.55 million current US$
in 2022
Malawi
14.76 million current US$
in 2023
IBRD only rank
19th
Malawi rank
17th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • IBRD only
  • Malawi
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197019962023

How they compare

IBRD only currently reports 143.55 million current US$ against 14.76 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 128.80 million current US$.

That makes IBRD only's figure about 9.7 times Malawi's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, IBRD only has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 19th and Malawi ranks 17th of 44 groups.

IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 38.13 million current US$ 330,000 current US$ 37.80 million current US$ IBRD only
1980s 110.86 million current US$ 1.48 million current US$ 109.38 million current US$ IBRD only
1990s 214.09 million current US$ 4.89 million current US$ 209.19 million current US$ IBRD only
2000s 119.07 million current US$ 6.72 million current US$ 112.35 million current US$ IBRD only
2010s 143.26 million current US$ 11.14 million current US$ 132.12 million current US$ IBRD only
2020s 142.30 million current US$ 11.91 million current US$ 130.39 million current US$ IBRD only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled, IBRD only or Malawi?
IBRD only, at 143.55 million current US$ against 14.76 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled between IBRD only and Malawi?
128.80 million current US$, with IBRD only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Malawi?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
IBRD only ranks 19th and Malawi ranks 17th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/ibrd-only/malawi/">IBRD only vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 8,391 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.