OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled

OECD members
5.86 million current US$
in 2022
Zimbabwe
6.64 million current US$
in 2023
OECD members rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • OECD members
  • Zimbabwe
05.0M10.0M15.0M197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6.64 million current US$ against 5.86 million current US$ in OECD members, a difference of 779,000 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was OECD members ahead.

OECD members ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 4.57 million current US$ 1.74 million current US$ 2.83 million current US$ OECD members
1990s 9.89 million current US$ 3.60 million current US$ 6.29 million current US$ OECD members
2000s 4.76 million current US$ 3.17 million current US$ 1.59 million current US$ OECD members
2010s 5.03 million current US$ 6.97 million current US$ 1.94 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 5.87 million current US$ 7.17 million current US$ 1.31 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled, OECD members or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6.64 million current US$ against 5.86 million current US$ in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
779,000 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
OECD members ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/oecd-members/zimbabwe/">OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 8,391 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.