Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled

Rwanda
6.35 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
6.64 million current US$
in 2023
Rwanda rank
39th
Zimbabwe rank
38th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6.64 million current US$ against 6.35 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 292,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 142 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.51 million current US$ 1.74 million current US$ 230,000 current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 12.29 million current US$ 3.60 million current US$ 8.69 million current US$ Rwanda
2000s 5.28 million current US$ 3.17 million current US$ 2.11 million current US$ Rwanda
2010s 8.60 million current US$ 6.97 million current US$ 1.63 million current US$ Rwanda
2020s 6.55 million current US$ 7.04 million current US$ 487,500 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6.64 million current US$ against 6.35 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
292,000 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), gaps filled?
Rwanda ranks 39th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-gaps-filled/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 8,391 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) with 70 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.