Botswana vs Post-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita

Botswana
0.4673 current US$ per person
in 2023
Post-demographic dividend
0.0034 current US$ per person
in 2022
Botswana rank
45th
Post-demographic dividend rank
42nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Post-demographic dividend
00.250.50.751197019962023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.4673 current US$ per person against 0.0034 current US$ per person in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.4639 current US$ per person.

That makes Botswana's figure about 139.5 times Post-demographic dividend's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 45th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 42nd of 142 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 0.1977 current US$ per person 0.0014 current US$ per person 0.1963 current US$ per person Botswana
1980s 0.4238 current US$ per person 0.0007 current US$ per person 0.4231 current US$ per person Botswana
1990s 0.7453 current US$ per person 0.0051 current US$ per person 0.7402 current US$ per person Botswana
2000s 0.5274 current US$ per person 0.0029 current US$ per person 0.5245 current US$ per person Botswana
2010s 0.4021 current US$ per person 0.0039 current US$ per person 0.3982 current US$ per person Botswana
2020s 0.4442 current US$ per person 0.0036 current US$ per person 0.4406 current US$ per person Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita, Botswana or Post-demographic dividend?
Botswana, at 0.4673 current US$ per person against 0.0034 current US$ per person in Post-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita between Botswana and Post-demographic dividend?
0.4639 current US$ per person, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Post-demographic dividend?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita?
Botswana ranks 45th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 42nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Post-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-capita/botswana/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-capita/botswana/post-demographic-dividend/">Botswana vs Post-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 8,321 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.