East Asia & Pacific vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita

East Asia & Pacific
0.0227 current US$ per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.6917 current US$ per person
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
37th
Equatorial Guinea rank
37th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.511.522.5197019962023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.6917 current US$ per person against 0.0227 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.669 current US$ per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 30.4 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 37th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 44 groups.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 0.022 current US$ per person 0.0354 current US$ per person 0.0133 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.033 current US$ per person 0.4778 current US$ per person 0.4448 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0394 current US$ per person 1.82 current US$ per person 1.78 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0254 current US$ per person 0.7917 current US$ per person 0.7663 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.028 current US$ per person 0.5897 current US$ per person 0.5617 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0249 current US$ per person 0.4991 current US$ per person 0.4741 current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita, East Asia & Pacific or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.6917 current US$ per person against 0.0227 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita between East Asia & Pacific and Equatorial Guinea?
0.669 current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Equatorial Guinea?
47 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 37th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific/equatorial-guinea/">East Asia & Pacific vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 8,321 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.