Belarus vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Belarus
5.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
4.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
101st
Congo rank
102nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Congo
-5051015197119972023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 101st and Congo ranks 102nd of 140 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Congo Difference Ahead
2000s 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3235 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Belarus or Congo?
Belarus, at 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Belarus and Congo?
0.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 101st and Congo ranks 102nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/congo-rep/">Belarus vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.