Cape Verde vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Cape Verde
183.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
156.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
13th
Malawi rank
15th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Malawi
0100200300400197019962023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 183.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 156.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 26.88 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 15th of 140 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 65.51 current US$ per square kilometre 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre 60.84 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 149.63 current US$ per square kilometre 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre 133.97 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 263.28 current US$ per square kilometre 51.9 current US$ per square kilometre 211.38 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 160.05 current US$ per square kilometre 71.33 current US$ per square kilometre 88.72 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 253.9 current US$ per square kilometre 118.16 current US$ per square kilometre 135.74 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 241 current US$ per square kilometre 133.84 current US$ per square kilometre 107.17 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Malawi?
Cape Verde, at 183.38 current US$ per square kilometre against 156.5 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Malawi?
26.88 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malawi?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Malawi rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 13th and Malawi ranks 15th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/malawi/">Cape Verde vs Malawi: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.