Central Europe and the Baltics vs Equatorial Guinea: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 45.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3532 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 45.21 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 129.0 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 40th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 44 groups.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.51 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.511 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.05 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.3532 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.4 current US$ per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Central Europe and the Baltics or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 45.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3532 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
- 45.21 current US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 40th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.