Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Chile
1.32 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Namibia
1.34 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
121st
Namibia rank
120th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Namibia
0246197019962023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Namibia ahead.

Chile ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 120th of 140 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Namibia Difference Ahead
1980s 0.6456 current US$ per square kilometre 1.46 current US$ per square kilometre 0.812 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre 3.75 current US$ per square kilometre 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.768 current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4941 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1629 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Chile or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Chile and Namibia?
0.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2017.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 120th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.