Djibouti vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Djibouti
68.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
2.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Djibouti rank
30th
IBRD only rank
32nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Djibouti
  • IBRD only
0255075100125197019962023

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 68.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 66.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 33.6 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 32nd of 140 countries.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti IBRD only Difference Ahead
1970s 2.37 current US$ per square kilometre 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9369 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
1980s 19.72 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre 17.5 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
1990s 42.67 current US$ per square kilometre 3.25 current US$ per square kilometre 39.41 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2000s 48.19 current US$ per square kilometre 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre 46.5 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2010s 46.09 current US$ per square kilometre 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre 44.06 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti
2020s 52.75 current US$ per square kilometre 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre 50.74 current US$ per square kilometre Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Djibouti or IBRD only?
Djibouti, at 68.12 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.03 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Djibouti and IBRD only?
66.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and IBRD only?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2022.
How do Djibouti and IBRD only rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Djibouti ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 32nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/ibrd-only/">Djibouti vs IBRD only: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.