Guinea-Bissau vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Guinea-Bissau
85.56 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
82.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
22nd
Uganda rank
23rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Uganda
050100150197019962023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 85.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 82.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 23rd of 140 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 16.36 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 current US$ per square kilometre 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 22.9 current US$ per square kilometre 32.77 current US$ per square kilometre 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 59.57 current US$ per square kilometre 60.54 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9764 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 58.64 current US$ per square kilometre 57.17 current US$ per square kilometre 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 103.01 current US$ per square kilometre 109.6 current US$ per square kilometre 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 83.62 current US$ per square kilometre 92.16 current US$ per square kilometre 8.53 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Guinea-Bissau or Uganda?
Guinea-Bissau, at 85.56 current US$ per square kilometre against 82.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Guinea-Bissau and Uganda?
2.62 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Uganda?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Uganda rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 22nd and Uganda ranks 23rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/uganda/">Guinea-Bissau vs Uganda: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.