Hong Kong, China vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square
Hong Kong, China
10 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1978
Zambia
11.13 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
88th
Zambia rank
85th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre against 10 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 85th of 140 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 11.13 current US$ per square kilometre against 10 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
- 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 1978.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 85th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.