Least developed countries vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Least developed countries
23.89 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Mauritius
231.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Least developed countries rank
11th
Mauritius rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Mauritius
0100200300400500197019962022

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 231.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 207.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 9.7 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 44 groups.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre 89.16 current US$ per square kilometre 87.18 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 7.9 current US$ per square kilometre 82.76 current US$ per square kilometre 74.85 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 15.05 current US$ per square kilometre 320.2 current US$ per square kilometre 305.15 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre 259.85 current US$ per square kilometre 249.81 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Least developed countries or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 231.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2003.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Least developed countries and Mauritius?
207.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mauritius?
34 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2003.
How do Least developed countries and Mauritius rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Least developed countries ranks 11th and Mauritius ranks 11th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mauritius/">Least developed countries vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.