Malawi vs South Asia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Malawi
156.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia
21.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
15th
South Asia rank
16th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Malawi
  • South Asia
050100150200250197019962023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 156.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.86 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia, a difference of 134.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 7.2 times South Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Asia ahead.

Malawi ranks 15th and South Asia ranks 16th of 140 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 4 and South Asia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi South Asia Difference Ahead
1970s 3.5 current US$ per square kilometre 7.18 current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1980s 15.66 current US$ per square kilometre 20.21 current US$ per square kilometre 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre South Asia
1990s 51.9 current US$ per square kilometre 27.6 current US$ per square kilometre 24.3 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 71.33 current US$ per square kilometre 16.78 current US$ per square kilometre 54.55 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 118.16 current US$ per square kilometre 25.68 current US$ per square kilometre 92.48 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 133.84 current US$ per square kilometre 23.82 current US$ per square kilometre 110.02 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Malawi or South Asia?
Malawi, at 156.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 21.86 current US$ per square kilometre in South Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Malawi and South Asia?
134.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and South Asia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malawi and South Asia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Malawi ranks 15th and South Asia ranks 16th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs South Asia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/south-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/south-asia/">Malawi vs South Asia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.