Pakistan vs East Timor: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square

Pakistan
68.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
75.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
29th
East Timor rank
27th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square over time

  • Pakistan
  • East Timor
050100150197019962023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 75.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 68.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 6.88 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 29th and East Timor ranks 27th of 140 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 12.19 current US$ per square kilometre 86.08 current US$ per square kilometre 73.89 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre 95.36 current US$ per square kilometre 76.3 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 34.1 current US$ per square kilometre 80.11 current US$ per square kilometre 46 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 53.38 current US$ per square kilometre 79.37 current US$ per square kilometre 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square, Pakistan or East Timor?
East Timor, at 75.59 current US$ per square kilometre against 68.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square between Pakistan and East Timor?
6.88 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and East Timor?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and East Timor rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per square?
Pakistan ranks 29th and East Timor ranks 27th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs East Timor: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unicef-current-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/timor-leste/">Pakistan vs East Timor: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,221 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.