IDA blend vs South Sudan: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per unit
IDA blend
0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Sudan
0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA blend rank
15th
South Sudan rank
17th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per unit over time
- IDA blend
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 9.4 times IDA blend's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 17th of 44 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per unit, IDA blend or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per unit between IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do IDA blend and South Sudan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unicef (current us$), per unit?
- IDA blend ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 17th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.