Aruba vs Syrian Arab Republic: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual
Aruba
-50 % change on previous year
in 1999
Syrian Arab Republic
-47.35 % change on previous year
in 2008
Aruba rank
61st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
58th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time
- Aruba
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports -47.35 % change on previous year against -50 % change on previous year in Aruba, a difference of 2.65 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Aruba ranks 61st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 58th of 170 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Aruba or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at -47.35 % change on previous year against -50 % change on previous year in Aruba as of 2008.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.65 % change on previous year, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Aruba and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
- Aruba ranks 61st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 58th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.