Chile vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual

Chile
-36.49 % change on previous year
in 2008
Zambia
-37.31 % change on previous year
in 2008
Chile rank
49th
Zambia rank
50th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time

  • Chile
  • Zambia
-1000100200300197019892008

How they compare

Chile currently reports -36.49 % change on previous year against -37.31 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0.82 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 50th of 170 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 15.49 % change on previous year 16.19 % change on previous year 0.7025 % change on previous year Zambia
1980s 33.62 % change on previous year 27.8 % change on previous year 5.82 % change on previous year Chile
1990s 4.33 % change on previous year 13.64 % change on previous year 9.31 % change on previous year Zambia
2000s -3.3 % change on previous year -2.66 % change on previous year 0.6411 % change on previous year Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Chile or Zambia?
Chile, at -36.49 % change on previous year against -37.31 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2008.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Chile and Zambia?
0.82 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?
39 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Chile ranks 49th and Zambia ranks 50th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/chile/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/chile/zambia/">Chile vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.