Early-demographic dividend vs Poland: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual

Early-demographic dividend
-70.43 % change on previous year
in 2008
Poland
21.95 % change on previous year
in 2004
Early-demographic dividend rank
22nd
Poland rank
22nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Poland
-1000100200300400197119892008

How they compare

Poland currently reports 21.95 % change on previous year against -70.43 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 92.38 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 22nd of 46 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 22.21 % change on previous year 5.06 % change on previous year 17.15 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2000s 0.8577 % change on previous year 5.08 % change on previous year 4.22 % change on previous year Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, Early-demographic dividend or Poland?
Poland, at 21.95 % change on previous year against -70.43 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend as of 2004.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between Early-demographic dividend and Poland?
92.38 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Poland?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Poland rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Poland ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Poland: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/poland/">Early-demographic dividend vs Poland: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.