East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
-75.58 % change on previous year
in 2008
Israel
0 % change on previous year
in 1996
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
26th
Israel rank
27th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Israel
0200400197019892008

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0 % change on previous year against -75.58 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 75.58 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Israel ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Israel ranks 27th of 46 groups.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 12.21 % change on previous year 8.21 % change on previous year 4 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 207.31 % change on previous year 65 % change on previous year 142.31 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 33.74 % change on previous year 26.46 % change on previous year 7.28 % change on previous year East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Israel?
Israel, at 0 % change on previous year against -75.58 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1996.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel?
75.58 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel?
15 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 1996.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, unta (current us$), annual?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Israel ranks 27th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-unta-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/israel/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 6,930 data points, 1970–2009
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.